Search
Log in
On January 25, Caspar Geelen defended his thesis ”Smart detection and real-time learning in water distribution: an integrated data-model approachs”
The person behind the science, and the science behind the person.
One of the grandest challenges in drinking water distribution is, and has been, transport. Yearly tons of clean ready-to-use water seep through the cracks of the piping network that houses it – and therefore tons of money too. Learn how professional puzzle solver and hobbyist data collector Caspar Geelen figured a solution out to this problem.
With a duct network worth 30 billion euros in the Netherlands, the stakes at breakage are high. “Although the chance at leakage is quite low, about one or two percent, costs can really add up due to the sheer size of the network,” Caspar explains, “and then we are only talking about the Netherlands, in Italy’s mountainous terrains and aging water infrastructure, 26-46% of the drinking water is lost.” With increasing freshwater scarcity, the troubles will only get greater.
Another problem arises from the network size: monitoring the immense framework seems impossible with the available data. Data density is sparse. “Drinking water companies have started to invest into smart sensors that consumers then place in their houses. But for now, the number of sensors in the transport pipes and households is limited,” Caspar says, “the rest of the useful data remains inaccessible underground.”
“In Italy’s mountainous terrains and aging water infrastructure, 26-46% of the drinking water is lost.
As a result of this knowledge deficit, solutions have remained to be found. “Causes for pipe fracture are often written off as breakage due to old age. But now we have the computing power to do much more with already available information,” says the data detective.
Caspar researched historical data to fight today’s troubles, and with this, he has taken the first steps to predictive leakage models. Next to that, the scientist developed a quick and clever algorithm that predicts the best place for new sensors and actuators – valves, pumps, etc.
“The world of data is like a floating iceberg,” Geelen says, “90% of the information is hidden in data, and as of yet, remains hidden from us underwater. So many correlations and causations you don’t spot at first sight.” Drinking water companies have data stored everywhere, especially surrounding leaks. The trouble is, it’s all over the place, and little is done with it.
“We wanted to learn the hidden patterns that arise at pipe leakage. Patterns are so complex – they are just not spotted by human observers. So, we built a program that could find the links and correlations between data points in historical data.” Using machine learning, the scientist could see what has led to leaks in the past.
Once fully resolved, the found parallels can help predict and prevent leaks in the future. “Full prediction is still a bit off, but we’re getting there,” says Caspar, “at least we can work towards real-time analysis. Currently, the companies are dependent on people calling in once there is a problem. With clever algorithms, we could prevent it in the first place.
“The world of data is like a floating iceberg: 90% of the information hidden in data, and as of yet, remains hidden from us underwater
But to get to that point, more data is needed. “It is hard to make accurate predictions with the sparse data we have now,” explains the scientist, “hence, we also developed a program that calculates the optimal placement of new sensors.”
That Caspar would be the one for this job, did not go without saying, as he started his academic career as a biotechnologist and bioinformatician. “I had been quite enthusiastic about mathematics all through high school,” tells Caspar, “but as I continued my studies, I wanted to stay attached to the familiar. As I liked biology, I chose it, but I did want to put my other skills to good use and thus got busy with a second study.
His aptitude for math landed him a research project in the group of Karel Keesman. “Once I finished that, Karel asked me if I maybe wanted to do a PhD. But I was not really going for that, and instead, I decided to do another project, but this time in bioinformatics. Once again, as I finished it, Karel told me of the position at Wetsus.”
“Though this time, I was up for a challenge. The project was totally different, not biology-related, but I saw the required skills and figured I could do it. It seemed like a great place to leave my imprint – give it my own twist, and give me the freedom to put my puzzle skills to the test.
And as my mathematics teacher had always told me: ‘You need to do a math-related study, you’re good at it, and you’ll enjoy it.’ Now, I’ll have to admit that she was right.
“Wetsus seemed like a great place to give me freedom and to put my puzzle skills to the test
Caspar discovered his love for data and information consumption also during his studies. “I remember being amazed at the sheer amount of information available on the internet. I was reading the weirdest papers – at one point, I read through an entire US survival manual just for fun,” he laughs, “I had plenty of time next to studying and the occasional party.”
Next, he discovered that he could do something with this data himself. “As treasurer of a student swimming club, I found the book-keeping a little tedious, so I set my mind to it and decided to write an application that does a lot automatically. I had no clue how to do it, but I got there by just spending a little time. I think they still use it now, eight years later,” he says grinning.
“And now that I got into programming, I guess I can’t shake it off anymore.”
Caspar will stay around Wetsus some more time to puzzle on – working two days a week as an AI specialist. “Though I do hope to do some more biotechnology-related projects in the future.”
Abstract
The realisation of a circular economy has thus far unfolded under the assumption that it would fit within existing economic arrangements. In practice, we witness many circular initiatives struggling to give shape to their ambitions, let alone develop to maturity. These past months, various material recycling organisations terminated their activities, seeing virgin alternatives from other parts of the world flooding the market at prices against they cannot compete. If the transition towards a circular economy (i.e. an economy of value preservation) is to be taken seriously, a new perspective on value in our economic system seems unavoidable, as the rewriting of the rules of the economic game. At this moment, current perceptions of value stand in the way of this transition both at micro as well as macro levels. Several contours for a collective exploration of new directions of value and economic configuration that foster circular transition will be addressed.
Abstract
In his key note he will conclude after a life of innovations that it is impossible that humanity will stay within the save planetary boundaries with innovation only. We should be more critical about the behaviour of the rich population in the world and more critical about new innovations that prove to be dangerous, like the PFAS crisis shows at this moment. In his keynote he will investigate how to look at the world that can stay within the save planetary boundaries, how should we change ourselves? It is clear if we only talk about the words of science and systems we miss the essential words of how we should cooperate and change ourselves. And his search for coherent save innovations. Which innovations will be save and will lead to a fair and sustainable world? And will lead to a world we want to live in.
Abstract
There is a growing number of new sustainable, inclusive, cohesive, participatory, just and humane economic models. A possible next step in the discourse about them is the comparative analysis in order to find out key commonalities, potential synergies, and “requirements” for a future-fit economic model. The author and initiator of the Economy for the Common Good provides an overview of these „new sustainable economic models“ and compares them according to underlying values, principles, and practical ways of implementation. The keynote addresses the cooperative spirit of the conference and prepares the ground for its public highlight on the eve of June 3rd, the round table with representatives of diverse future-fit economic models.
Abstract
The scientific debate on whether economies should always continue to grow increasingly becomes a political and societal debate. On the one hand further growth for the most affluent countries seems neither possible nor valuable, but on the other hand there is still lack of understanding and knowledge what a non-growing economy should look like and could best be governed. In this lecture we discuss various policy measures that can be realistically implemented, take into account government finances and aim at a higher quality of life despite a non-growing economy.
Abstract
Democracy is under pressure, and less and less able to stir the economy into a sustainable direction. Therefore, to stabilize democracy and to make possible the socio-ecological transformation of the economy, democratic principles need to be implemented directly in the economy. This is not only a matter of morality, but also has practical advantages. Democratizing the economy can increase legitimacy and take advantage of the “knowledge of the many” to accelerate the transformation. Democratic practices, especially deliberation, allow bringing together different forms of knowledge, which is crucial for the local implementation of principles of social and ecological sustainability. This talk explores what this idea means in more concrete terms, from democratic participation in the workplace to the democratization of time.
Abstract
Over the past decades, markets have conventionally been seen as the best instrument to stimulate economic growth and enhance prosperity and well-being. The automatic link between markets and economic growth is increasingly questioned, however, as well as the automatic link between economic growth and enhancement of well-being. This has led to attempts to capture well-being development more directly than through GDP per capita figures and has produced a more variegated picture of well-being growth. Also, this has led to a shift of focus to other coordination systems than the market, as primarily the state but increasingly also the association. Analyses of the historical record suggest that especially the latter could be a vital component in future well-being.
